Aggregate production planning generally deals with configuration of an aggregate plan in advance of 6 to 18 periods (e.g. months) to give the organizations an idea about the amount of invested money, utilized capacity, required inventory and any other procurement activities need to be done before the actual times arrives. Inherent uncertainties faced by the planners (caused by unreliable estimates of demand, cost or production processes) could make the production planning a challenging task. That is, the production planners not only have to deal with the available parameters’ uncertainties (Demand, cost, etc.), but also, new information which become available with the pass of time, sometimes requires several re-planning activities for the future periods. Stochastic and Fuzzy planning are among the popular techniques to deal with the uncertainties in optimization models. While the stochastic/fuzzy programming techniques provide a more realistic representation of future estimations, the production plans need to be also revised from one planning period to another as time rolls and new information become available (a.k.a. rolling horizon planning). However, frequent re-planning activities and changes in the production plans could result in a state of plan instability causing plan related “nervousness” in manufacturing firms, which could undermine manager’s confidence in the system, depriving it of the support needed for successful operations. It could also result in disruptions in the production and delivery systems, which could result in inaccurate personnel scheduling, machine loading, and unnecessary supplier orders.
Frozen horizon along with other solution approaches attempt to provide insights on how to mitigate nervousness, however, most of the existing approaches do not consider the flexibility aspect in production plans. Flexible Requirements Profile (FRP) and bi-objective optimization are alternative stabilizing approaches which are the focus of this research. In FRP, flexible bounds are enforced on production plans to maintain the desired degree of flexibility. Instead of 0% flexibility in the case of a frozen period or 100% flexibility in the case of plan to order, FRP model considers different flexibility levels. For the bi-objective optimization approach, the production planning problem can also be formulated with two objectives, where one trades-off between the traditional cost objective and the plan stability objective.
Our main research objectives are:
1) to compare FRP-APP with Stochastic and Fuzzy APP in terms of both plan cost and stability,
2) to develop and compare new “hybrid” Stochastic and Fuzzy FRP-APP models to combine the strengths of stochastic and fuzzy models, which represent input uncertainties more realistically, and FRP models that have better control over plan variability,
3) to develop and compare new Stochastic and Fuzzy Bi-objective APP models as alternate techniques to trade off the traditional cost objective with the stability objective formally following a multi-objective decision making framework, and
4) to conduct extensive testing of the proposed FRP-based and Bi-objective models under various industry scenarios.